You keep watching. More videos pop up. One claims that wages aren't really income. Another insists that only federal employees owe taxes. A third guarantees you can eliminate your tax debt by declaring you're a "state citizen" instead of a U.S. citizen.

It sounds too good to be true. And here's the thing about things that sound too good to be true: they almost always are.

Welcome to the world of frivolous tax arguments. These aren't legitimate legal strategies that aggressive tax attorneys debate in courtrooms. They're thoroughly debunked positions that have been rejected by courts thousands of times over decades. Yet every year, taxpayers fall for these arguments. And every year, the IRS imposes millions of dollars in penalties on those who file returns based on these bogus claims.

The question isn't whether the IRS takes frivolous tax arguments seriously. They absolutely do. The real question is whether you're willing to risk your financial future by believing someone on the internet who promises you can legally stop paying taxes with "one weird trick."

What Makes a Tax Argument "Frivolous"

Let's get brutally clear about something. Having a good faith disagreement with the IRS about how much tax you owe is not frivolous. Making an honest mistake on your return is not frivolous. Taking an aggressive but legally defensible position that ultimately gets rejected is not frivolous.

Frivolous tax arguments are something else entirely. They're positions that have been so thoroughly rejected by courts that asserting them demonstrates either willful ignorance or deliberate defiance of the law.

The IRS maintains an official list of frivolous positions in Notice 2010-33. This isn't some secret document. It's publicly available. The IRS essentially put out a memo saying "these arguments don't work, have never worked, and will never work, so stop wasting everyone's time."

Here's what makes an argument frivolous according to Section 6702 of the Internal Revenue Code. The position must either lack any basis in law or fact, or it must be patently improper. Courts look at whether reasonable people could disagree about the interpretation, not whether you personally find it convincing.

If every federal court that has ever heard your argument has rejected it, and the Supreme Court has refused to even review it because the issue is so clearly settled, congratulations. You've got yourself a frivolous argument.

The 7 Most Common Frivolous Arguments That Get Taxpayers in Trouble

Let's walk through the greatest hits of tax protester mythology. These are the arguments that show up again and again in penalty cases.

First, the "taxes are voluntary" argument. This one claims that because the IRS uses the phrase "voluntary compliance" in some of its materials, paying taxes must be optional. Wrong. Voluntary compliance means taxpayers calculate and report their own taxes rather than having the government do it for them. The obligation to pay is absolutely mandatory. Courts have rejected this argument so many times they've stopped being polite about it.

Second, the "wages aren't income" argument. Tax protesters claim that wages represent an even exchange of labor for money, so there's no gain to tax. This contradicts Section 61 of the Internal Revenue Code, which explicitly includes compensation for services in the definition of gross income. It also contradicts about a century of unbroken case law. You will lose this argument 100 times out of 100.

Third, the "only federal employees pay taxes" argument. This creative interpretation suggests that tax laws only apply to federal workers or residents of federal territories. Every court that has heard this argument has called it absurd. The Internal Revenue Code applies to all U.S. citizens and residents with taxable income, period.

Fourth, the "filing is voluntary" argument. Similar to the first one, but focused specifically on whether you have to file a return. Section 6012 requires any person with gross income above a certain threshold to file. Not optional. Not negotiable. Courts have described this argument as "patently frivolous."

Fifth, constitutional arguments. Tax protesters love claiming the Sixteenth Amendment was never properly ratified, or that income taxes violate the Fifth Amendment, or some other constitutional objection. The Supreme Court settled these issues a century ago. The income tax is constitutional. Full stop.

Sixth, the "state citizen" gambit. This one claims you can escape federal tax obligations by declaring yourself a citizen of your state rather than a United States citizen. Courts have rejected this argument countless times and often impose sanctions on taxpayers who raise it.

Seventh, religious or moral objections. Some taxpayers argue their religious or philosophical beliefs exempt them from paying taxes. While the First Amendment protects religious freedom, it doesn't include a right to violate neutral laws of general applicability like tax laws. The Supreme Court made this clear decades ago.

The Real Penalties You Face for Frivolous Arguments

Photo by Wesley Tingey on Unsplash

This is where things get expensive. The IRS has multiple tools to punish taxpayers who file frivolous returns or make frivolous arguments in disputes.

In 2024, a taxpayer named Ruben Varela learned this lesson the hard way. He filed a return reporting zero wages and zero income despite actually earning over $11,000. He attached Forms 4852 claiming the amounts on his W-2 were wrong. The Tax Court sustained the $5,000 penalty, explaining that his return was by definition frivolous under Notice 2010-33.

But the Section 6702 penalty is just the beginning. If you take your frivolous arguments to Tax Court, Section 6673 allows the court to impose an additional penalty of up to $25,000. Courts regularly impose this penalty on taxpayers who persist in making frivolous arguments after being warned.

Beyond these specific frivolous argument penalties, you're still liable for all the normal penalties that apply to underpaying your taxes. The accuracy-related penalty under Section 6662 is 20% of the underpayment. The civil fraud penalty under Section 6663 is 75% of the underpayment. Erroneous refund claims carry their own 20% penalty under Section 6676.

Stack all these penalties together and you can quickly find yourself owing double or triple your original tax liability. Plus interest. Plus professional fees if you're foolish enough to hire an attorney to argue these positions in court.

When Frivolous Arguments Cross Into Criminal Territory

Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya on Unsplash

Here's where the moths don't just get burned. They get incinerated.

Most frivolous tax cases are civil matters. You pay penalties but you don't go to jail. However, if the IRS believes you're willfully attempting to evade taxes through frivolous arguments, they can refer your case for criminal prosecution.

Tax evasion under Section 7201 is a felony. The maximum penalty is $100,000 in fines and five years in federal prison. That's per tax year. If you've been filing frivolous returns for multiple years, the charges and sentences can stack.

Filing a false return under Section 7206 carries up to three years in prison. Failing to file required returns under Section 7203 carries up to one year in prison. These aren't theoretical possibilities. The IRS prosecutes hundreds of tax crimes every year, and frivolous filers are absolutely on their radar.

The Department of Justice has successfully prosecuted countless taxpayers who relied on frivolous arguments. Courts show no sympathy. The standard response is essentially "ignorance of the law is no excuse, especially when you've been repeatedly warned that your position is wrong." You can review tax crime prosecutions on the Department of Justice website.

The People Who Promote These Arguments Are Even Worse Off

Let's talk about the promoters. These are the people selling books, courses, seminars, and consulting services based on frivolous tax theories. They make money convincing others to adopt positions that will get those people in serious trouble.

The IRS goes after promoters even harder than they go after the taxpayers who follow their advice. Section 6700 imposes a $1,000 penalty per document for promoting abusive tax shelters. For corporations, it's $10,000 per document. Given that promoters often distribute materials to hundreds or thousands of people, these penalties add up fast.

Courts can also issue injunctions permanently barring promoters from preparing returns or advising others on tax matters. In United States v. Schulz, a federal court permanently barred Robert Schulz and his organizations from promoting a scheme based on the claim that federal income taxation is voluntary.

These injunctions aren't suggestions. Violating an injunction is contempt of court, which can result in substantial fines and imprisonment. The courts have zero tolerance for people who continue promoting frivolous arguments after being ordered to stop.

If someone is selling you a tax strategy based on any of the arguments we've discussed, run the other way. They're either deliberately scamming you, or they're true believers who will take you down with them.

Why Do Smart People Fall for This

This is the question that puzzles tax professionals. How do educated, successful people convince themselves that frivolous arguments have merit when literally thousands of court cases say otherwise?

The answer is a mix of motivated reasoning, confirmation bias, and wishful thinking. Nobody likes paying taxes. When someone presents what sounds like a legal way to avoid them, people want to believe it's true. They seek out information that confirms what they want to believe and dismiss contradictory evidence.

Tax protester arguments often include just enough legal-sounding language to seem plausible to non-lawyers. They cite sections of the tax code, quote court cases out of context, and create elaborate theories about what words like "income" and "person" really mean. To someone unfamiliar with legal research, it can sound convincing.

The internet makes it worse. Tax protesters create echo chambers where everyone reinforces everyone else's beliefs. They rationalize away the thousands of cases rejecting their positions by claiming the courts are corrupt or the judges are in on the conspiracy. They treat government warnings as evidence they're onto something.

What You Should Do Instead

Photo by Olga DeLawrence on Unsplash

If you're frustrated with the tax system, you have legitimate options that don't involve risking penalties and prosecution.

If you genuinely believe you're being taxed incorrectly, hire a qualified tax attorney or CPA to review your situation. They can tell you whether you have a legitimate issue to contest or whether you're heading toward trouble.

If you can't afford to pay your taxes, the IRS has programs to help. Installment agreements let you pay over time. Offers in compromise can reduce your debt if you truly can't afford to pay the full amount. Currently Not Collectible status can pause collection while you get back on your feet.

If you have a legitimate legal question about how the tax law applies to your specific situation, that's what the courts are for. But you need a colorable legal argument, not a frivolous one that's been rejected thousands of times.

What you should absolutely not do is file a return based on frivolous arguments you found online. The short-term satisfaction of "sticking it to the IRS" will be vastly outweighed by the long-term consequences of penalties, interest, and potential prosecution.

If you're facing IRS penalties or have questions about your tax obligations, don't risk navigating the complexities of tax law alone. At IRSProb.com, our team of experienced tax professionals is here to help you resolve your IRS issues. Whether you're dealing with frivolous arguments or other tax problems, we offer expert advice and personalized strategies to ensure you're in compliance and protected from unnecessary penalties.