Skip to content 
A recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling has sent ripples through the world of small business, with significant implications for how closely held businesses are valued for estate tax purposes. The Court’s decision to include corporate-owned life insurance (COLI) in the valuation of a decedent’s business interest could have a profound impact on the way business owners plan for the future.
Case Overview:
The case involved two brothers who co-owned a building supply company in St. Louis. They had set up a hybrid buy-sell agreement, a common tool used by business owners to manage the transfer of ownership in the event of death or retirement. Under their agreement, if one brother passed away, the surviving brother could choose to buy out the deceased brother’s shares. If the surviving brother declined, the company would redeem the shares using the proceeds from a life insurance policy taken out on each brother.
When Michael, one of the brothers, passed away, his brother Thomas opted not to purchase the shares. The company used $3 million from the life insurance policy to buy out Michael’s interest. However, the IRS challenged the valuation, arguing that Michael’s share of the business was actually worth $5.3 million, leading to an estate tax liability of $890,000. The Supreme Court ultimately upheld the IRS’s position, ruling that the company’s contractual obligation to redeem the shares did not reduce their value for estate tax purposes.
Implications for Business Owners:
This ruling has important consequences for small business owners, particularly those who rely on life insurance to fund buy-sell agreements. Here are some key considerations:
1.Review Your Buy-Sell Agreements:
If your business has a buy-sell agreement in place, it’s crucial to review it in light of this ruling. Ensure that the agreement is structured in a way that minimizes potential estate tax liabilities. Depending on your circumstances, a cross-purchase agreement might be more beneficial, allowing surviving owners to purchase shares directly using life insurance proceeds.
2.Evaluate Your Life Insurance Policies:
Take a close look at your life insurance policies to ensure they are adequately structured to support the transfer of ownership interests without triggering unexpected tax liabilities. Consult with a tax advisor to ensure that your policies are properly aligned with your overall estate plan.
3.Plan for Potential Tax Liabilities:
The Supreme Court’s decision highlights the importance of preparing for potential estate tax liabilities. Consider setting aside funds to cover any potential taxes that could arise from a redemption agreement. Planning ahead can help you avoid financial strain on your business and heirs.
4.Maintain Thorough Documentation:
Keep detailed records of all valuations, agreements, and related decisions. In the event of an IRS audit or dispute, having clear documentation will be essential in defending your valuation and minimizing tax exposure.
5.Monitor Changes in Estate Tax Exemptions:
The federal estate tax exemption is currently $13.61 million for 2024. However, this exemption is scheduled to revert to $5 million, adjusted for inflation from 2018 to 2025, in 2026. Staying informed about these changes and planning accordingly can help you avoid unpleasant surprises.
Conclusion:
The Supreme Court’s ruling underscores the complexities involved in valuing closely held business interests for estate tax purposes. For small business owners, this decision is a critical reminder to proactively manage their estate plans, especially when life insurance and buy-sell agreements are involved. By staying informed and planning ahead, you can protect your business and ensure that your heirs are not burdened with unforeseen tax consequences.
If you’re concerned about how this ruling might affect your business, it’s essential to consult with a tax advisor who can help you navigate these complexities and safeguard your financial interests.
